One side entry at PL category
- safzalhussain
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 44
- Thank you received: 0
9 years 10 months ago #16906
by safzalhussain
One side entry at PL category was created by safzalhussain
is it possible in T24, to make a one side entry at PL Category to nullify any loss ?
We have a situation, where system has generated a loss entry at CATEG.ENTRY PL.53510 with amount Rs. 200,000. Can we make a contra (one side entry) on same category i.e PL.53510 so that we can show a similar amount with gain to nullify this loss.
We have a situation, where system has generated a loss entry at CATEG.ENTRY PL.53510 with amount Rs. 200,000. Can we make a contra (one side entry) on same category i.e PL.53510 so that we can show a similar amount with gain to nullify this loss.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jpb
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- retired . . . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Less
More
- Posts: 2859
- Thank you received: 649
9 years 10 months ago #16909
by jpb
Replied by jpb on topic One side entry at PL category
From R08 you can raise single sided Data Capture entries by editing the corresponding Fxxx.DC.BATCH.CONTROL to make it look balanced after inputting the first transaction and only after this authorise the DC.Line 003/004 amount debit/credit in local currency
Line 005/006 amount debit/credit in foreign currency
these pair have to be the same, FCY lines are only used when not booked in LCY.
1. Input DC and leave it INAU
2. Edit the DC.BATCH.CONTROL
3. Authorise the DC
Try on a copy first, getting the DC to be authorised has to be trained ;-)
*File FBNK.DC.BATCH.CONTROL , Record 'DC15....
Command-> FI
0001 1
0002 1
0003 9999
0004 9999
0005 8888
0006 8888
0007 INAU
0008 XX0010001
0009
0010
0011
0012
0013
0014
0015
0016
0017 N
0018
0019 INPUTTERLine 005/006 amount debit/credit in foreign currency
these pair have to be the same, FCY lines are only used when not booked in LCY.
1. Input DC and leave it INAU
2. Edit the DC.BATCH.CONTROL
3. Authorise the DC
Try on a copy first, getting the DC to be authorised has to be trained ;-)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- safzalhussain
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 44
- Thank you received: 0
9 years 10 months ago #16935
by safzalhussain
Replied by safzalhussain on topic One side entry at PL category
thanks for your response.
Kindly also suggest how to check the impact on AMPL after applying the steps which you had suggested.?
Is there any alternative of RUNNING COB to check the impact on PL.
Kindly also suggest how to check the impact on AMPL after applying the steps which you had suggested.?
Is there any alternative of RUNNING COB to check the impact on PL.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jpb
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- retired . . . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Less
More
- Posts: 2859
- Thank you received: 649
9 years 10 months ago #16936
by jpb
Replied by jpb on topic One side entry at PL category
I see no alternative to running a COB.
For sure you will face a difference in PL and transaction journal, the single sided booking is foreseen to correct such differences (or to clear out when you have to amend CAL/CPL directly). Normally the helpdesk can advice who to proceed in such cases.
Better would be to reverse out the loss . . .
For sure you will face a difference in PL and transaction journal, the single sided booking is foreseen to correct such differences (or to clear out when you have to amend CAL/CPL directly). Normally the helpdesk can advice who to proceed in such cases.
Better would be to reverse out the loss . . .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- safzalhussain
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 44
- Thank you received: 0
9 years 10 months ago #16937
by safzalhussain
Replied by safzalhussain on topic One side entry at PL category
OK. THANKS.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.081 seconds