WHEN DOES SPF gets corrupted?

hi all,

i found a problem in working in a live environment. when i deleted a record of a template of a local application from the back end it was not allowing to enter again. seems like the .profile is deleted or some thing. i am not sure it happened due to back end editing. or unix admin.

how the spf checksum is maintained or the integrity of globus files ?

is there any solution when the corrupted spf can be restored back and continue normal working.

Hi Girish,

If you delete or edit any local application the SPF will not be corrupted. Only when the SPF is eddited in the backend it will be corrupted. The best way is contact temenos.

if it is not the live environment then create a program in BP as below which will solve the problem. if the environment is live do not do this.

SUBROUTINE CHECK.SPF
RETURN
END

Pls note that the CHECK.SPF is a core routine. You are overwriting the core routine and making this routine as dummy.

once again pls note not to do this in live.

Rgds
Karthik

Hi Girish,

As karthik said, there is no relation between your local record in local application and the SYSTEM record in the SPF application.

The reson for SPF corruption is,

someone might be changed the SYSTEM record in the backend. To restore the old SYSTEM record, restore the yesterdays backup record. Or change the current to the original settings.

The CHECKSUM for SPF record is maintained by the routine CHECK.SPF. As karthk said you can replace it with your own. But if you change this in live then you will sack from the bank.

'when i deleted a record of a template of a local application from the back end it was not allowing to enter again.'

Check the same record is in $HIS. Give some more info, so that we can fix this issue.
_________________
M A L A I

jshell ~ -->JED T24.BP CHECK.SPF


SUBROUTINE CHECK.SPF
$INSERT I_COMMON
$INSERT I_EQUATE

RETURN
END


Then save, Now run everything will be alright..It will work fine..

Ive tried and this doenst work on my end. I got also duplicate entries

Subroutine: /buh/buhtest/bnk.run/t24lib/eb_api/lib0.so.1
jBC CHECK.SPF version 12.0 Thu Mar 7 13:36:29 2019
jBC CHECK.SPF source file R12_EB_API_11.SOURCE
Executable: /buh/buhtest/bnk.run/localbin/CHECK.SPF.so
jBC main() version 12.0 Tue Aug 18 09:19:05 2020
jBC main() source file T24.BP
Executable (DUP!!): /buh/buhtest/bnk.run/localbin/CHECK.SPF
jBC main() version 12.0 Tue Aug 18 09:19:05 2020
jBC main() source file T24.BP

Hi
this way isn't correct - you're trying to bypass core check... Better ask Temenos how to correct the situation.

Hi VK,

Ive already contact the Temenos Live chat support and gave me the proper maintenance code.

On my end this code is not working

Hi
what happens exactly?

I've installed the BE module in our old env which has 200 users. the license is for 275 users. On next day there is an error that the "SPF was corrupted".

As per temenos, when updating product browser should be down and only one user should be login. they fix the issue by giving the code

Hi
of course, there can be only one :)))

Thank you guys, it really help my issue with interface messaging, since from jboss log is :

2020-09-22 16:33:56,344 ERROR [STDERR] Sep 22, 2020 4:33:56 PM com.jbase.jremote.io.JRemoteSocketConnection receive
WARNING: Failed to receive message

I though something wrong with jboss setup, then discover following message from login GLOBUS:
SPF has been corrupted - Contact Helpdesk immediately (22 - APAIDBPJS001)
CONTINUE (Y) Access granted, but contact Temenos as soon as possible

After all, I create dummy routine CHECK.SPF to override the core routine and voila,, issue solved

Vinay Kumar D G wrote:

jshell ~ -->JED T24.BP CHECK.SPF


SUBROUTINE CHECK.SPF
$INSERT I_COMMON
$INSERT I_EQUATE

RETURN
END


Then save, Now run everything will be alright..It will work fine..

Does anyone try this on R20 TAFJ?

Hi
I don't see any technical reason why it shouldn't work (even without INSERTs) but please keep in mind that Temenos might consider this as license breach... I believe it shouldn't be done in Production environment. Rather push Temenos to fix the error.
 

Hi VK,

I have a R18 TAFJ local environment where the maintenance code is expired.
I tried to bypasss with the above change in CHECK.SPF. It works for Classic login, but when i login to browser, it asks for maintance code. Could you please help with this please....?

Hi
Sorry you'll have to contact Temenos I afraid...