FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION
- namco
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
16 years 1 month ago #3835
by namco
FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION was created by namco
Globus :G13
I want to automate the RD charges on unpaid cheque so i added the comm type on the FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION record used to process the unpaid cheques however its not charging . Is this because to process the unpaid cheques we use FT.TAPES. Or am i miss it somewhere
I want to automate the RD charges on unpaid cheque so i added the comm type on the FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION record used to process the unpaid cheques however its not charging . Is this because to process the unpaid cheques we use FT.TAPES. Or am i miss it somewhere
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bala_gates
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 152
- Thank you received: 0
16 years 1 month ago - 16 years 1 month ago #3836
by bala_gates
Replied by bala_gates on topic Re:FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION
Dear Namco
If you are in the initial stage of RD Product implementation, you can try to implement through AZ product instead of FT. Under Savings Plan you can set Recurring Deposit module and you can set Penalty, late repayment charges and etc... AZ is handy for RD product.
Regards
Balaguru
If you are in the initial stage of RD Product implementation, you can try to implement through AZ product instead of FT. Under Savings Plan you can set Recurring Deposit module and you can set Penalty, late repayment charges and etc... AZ is handy for RD product.
Regards
Balaguru
Last edit: 16 years 1 month ago by bala_gates.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- namco
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
16 years 1 month ago #3841
by namco
Replied by namco on topic Re:FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION
do you have any documentation on the AZ product
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- namco
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
16 years 1 month ago #3878
by namco
Replied by namco on topic Re:FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION
But the question is why is it not charging the customers despite setting this up in FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION
TRANSACTION.TYPE.. ACO7
1. 1 GB DESCRIPTION. Unpaid Cheque
2. 1 GB SHORT.DESCR. Unpaid Cheque
3 TXN.CODE.CR....... 49 RETURNED CHEQUE (CR)
4 TXN.CODE.DR....... 19 RETURNED CHEQUE (DR)
5 STO.TXN.CODE.CR... 49 RETURNED CHEQUE (CR)
6 STO.TXN.CODE.DR... 19 RETURNED CHEQUE (DR)
7 DR.CHARGE.TXN.CODE 189 RETURNED CHEQUE FEE
8 DR.CHEQUE.TXN.CODE 207 Outward Cheque - Dr
9. 1 COMM.TYPES..... RDCHQ RETURNED/UNPAID CHQ FEE
11 FORW.VALUE.MAXIMUM Y
12 BACK.VALUE.MAXIMUM Y
13. 1 PAYMENT.TYPE... ALL
14. 1 PAYMENT.VALUE.. Y
15. 1 CUSTOMER.FLOAT. 0
17 DR.ADVICE.REQD.Y.N N
18 CR.ADVICE.REQD.Y.N N
TRANSACTION.TYPE.. ACO7
1. 1 GB DESCRIPTION. Unpaid Cheque
2. 1 GB SHORT.DESCR. Unpaid Cheque
3 TXN.CODE.CR....... 49 RETURNED CHEQUE (CR)
4 TXN.CODE.DR....... 19 RETURNED CHEQUE (DR)
5 STO.TXN.CODE.CR... 49 RETURNED CHEQUE (CR)
6 STO.TXN.CODE.DR... 19 RETURNED CHEQUE (DR)
7 DR.CHARGE.TXN.CODE 189 RETURNED CHEQUE FEE
8 DR.CHEQUE.TXN.CODE 207 Outward Cheque - Dr
9. 1 COMM.TYPES..... RDCHQ RETURNED/UNPAID CHQ FEE
11 FORW.VALUE.MAXIMUM Y
12 BACK.VALUE.MAXIMUM Y
13. 1 PAYMENT.TYPE... ALL
14. 1 PAYMENT.VALUE.. Y
15. 1 CUSTOMER.FLOAT. 0
17 DR.ADVICE.REQD.Y.N N
18 CR.ADVICE.REQD.Y.N N
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- namco
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
16 years 4 weeks ago #3916
by namco
Replied by namco on topic Re:FT.TXN.TYPE.CONDITION
i was able to attach a routine onto the version .However on its crediting less the charge which is what is is suppose to do. However is it possible to set it up so that the credit and the charge do in as two separate amounts.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.032 seconds