Account and FT rollback due FT error by Service

  • Azizfatkh
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
13 years 7 months ago #11257 by Azizfatkh
Good day,

Having a task in which its required to create an account and few ft's for it by a service, but when one of ft it is meant to be with error everything gets rolled back without getting hold, even the account. Don't get why? Gts control is set to 1. T24 R10.

Haven't got much experience with services, so I would appreciate your help.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Azizfatkh
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
13 years 7 months ago #11258 by Azizfatkh
Quick notice... New FT ID doesn't gets generated, instead it starts from the one created before by a service.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • sri
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
13 years 7 months ago #11264 by sri
Dont do such things by Service because the Account gets locked as you are doing FT also .

Make it a mainline program and proceed. Your Issue will be resolved.

Regards,

Srinivas Yadav

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 7 months ago #11280 by durai611
Dear Azizfatkh,

In service which method you are using to process OFS message?

I suppose you are using OFS.CALL.BULK.MANAGER or OFS.BULK.MANAGER to process the OFS.
In this case if any of a message fails all the other gets rolled back. This is because all the messages are processed in a sinlge transaction boundary.

Provide some more details if it's not the case.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Azizfatkh
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
13 years 7 months ago - 13 years 7 months ago #11285 by Azizfatkh
thanks all! Was OFS.GLOBUS.MANAGER and now it seems fine by changing to OFS.POST.MESSAGE logic.
Last edit: 13 years 7 months ago by Azizfatkh.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.029 seconds