×
Discuss about OFS, Temenos Connectors, Various OFS modes, OFS with Versions, OFS performance, Logging, EB.PHANTOM, OFS.SOURCE etc…
MT206 processing in T24
- ridik
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 94
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 8 months ago #13636
by ridik
MT206 processing in T24 was created by ridik
Hi, all
I have an application who received truncated checks by means of MT206 swift message, which is a deprecated message at present. Does any one knows a replacement for this message? Or can recomend how I can manage to load does truncated cheques on T24 using siwft interface?
Thanks in advance.
I have an application who received truncated checks by means of MT206 swift message, which is a deprecated message at present. Does any one knows a replacement for this message? Or can recomend how I can manage to load does truncated cheques on T24 using siwft interface?
Thanks in advance.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jpb
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- retired . . . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Less
More
- Posts: 2860
- Thank you received: 650
12 years 8 months ago #13640
by jpb
Replied by jpb on topic MT206 processing in T24
I don't think there is any replacement for MT206/MT256 as they are subject to bilateral agreements...
In general you can process every incoming message, it's just a question of defining DE.MESSAGE, DE.MAPPING, DE.FORMAT.SWIFT and the triggered InwardOfsRtn.
In general you can process every incoming message, it's just a question of defining DE.MESSAGE, DE.MAPPING, DE.FORMAT.SWIFT and the triggered InwardOfsRtn.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ridik
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 94
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 8 months ago #13645
by ridik
Replied by ridik on topic MT206 processing in T24
Hi, jpb
That's fair enough.
By the way, is there any template routine for InwardOfsRtn?
thanks
That's fair enough.
By the way, is there any template routine for InwardOfsRtn?
thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jpb
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- retired . . . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Less
More
- Posts: 2860
- Thank you received: 650
12 years 8 months ago #13648
by jpb
Replied by jpb on topic MT206 processing in T24
I don't know official templates but there are some DE.I.MTxxx routines in T24.BP/GLOBUS.BP and also DE.I.TAGxx routines that can be quite helpful.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ridik
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ridik
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 94
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 8 months ago #13723
by ridik
Replied by ridik on topic MT206 processing in T24
Hi, jpb
I already have define local inward routine DE.I.MT206, and also DE.I.TAGXX routines for the particular tag fields of this swift message. I created respective entry on DE.MESSAGE (APPLICATION.QUEUE set to local product) and DE.FORMAT.SWIFT for these message, and set the routines on DE.MESSAGE and DE.I.SUROUTINE.TABLE.
I have been able to process some sample message where I set some but not all the tags, so I can identify tag problems, and in general the inward process work. But I'm having issue with some tags that fired the message to repair whenever they are present. In DE.I.HEADER, fields DISPOSITION is set to REPAIR and in ERROR.CODE is set to "Field.id & does not exist in format file#XX".
Any suggestions?
Thanks
I already have define local inward routine DE.I.MT206, and also DE.I.TAGXX routines for the particular tag fields of this swift message. I created respective entry on DE.MESSAGE (APPLICATION.QUEUE set to local product) and DE.FORMAT.SWIFT for these message, and set the routines on DE.MESSAGE and DE.I.SUROUTINE.TABLE.
I have been able to process some sample message where I set some but not all the tags, so I can identify tag problems, and in general the inward process work. But I'm having issue with some tags that fired the message to repair whenever they are present. In DE.I.HEADER, fields DISPOSITION is set to REPAIR and in ERROR.CODE is set to "Field.id & does not exist in format file#XX".
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jpb
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- retired . . . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Less
More
- Posts: 2860
- Thank you received: 650
12 years 8 months ago #13725
by jpb
Replied by jpb on topic MT206 processing in T24
Not easy to suggest what is behind without the details, but I suppose that you have a field e.g. 34B in your incoming message but only 34A defined in DE.FORMAT.SWIFT. The standard mapping will look for 34B, when it's not found for other alpha-extensions, last for 34X and when this is also not found the error is triggered with 34X instead of 34B.
Hope you understand - I know it sounds confusing.
Hope you understand - I know it sounds confusing.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ridik
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.031 seconds