- Forum
- T24 Technical Discussions
- T24 Development & Customization
- INPUT.BUFFER, V$FUNCTION,REBUILD.SCREEN compatible IN R23
×
Discuss on Template programming, jBASE programming, Enquiries, No-File enquiry, Enquiry routines, Version, Version routines, Menus, Abbriviations, Creating local reference fields, Fast path enquiries, Creating charts and graphs, Generating Reports, Deal slips, Straight through processing, Multi Company and Multi Book setup, Tabbed screens, Composite Screens, T24 API, etc...
INPUT.BUFFER, V$FUNCTION,REBUILD.SCREEN compatible IN R23
- Ramesh
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
4 months 2 weeks ago - 4 months 2 weeks ago #24495
by Ramesh
INPUT.BUFFER, V$FUNCTION,REBUILD.SCREEN compatible IN R23 was created by Ramesh
Hi all,
Can anyone let me know if the following keywords compatible in R23 and if not what can it replaced with for the functionality:
V$FUNCTION
INPUT.BUFFER
INPUT
REBUILD.SCREEN
Can anyone let me know if the following keywords compatible in R23 and if not what can it replaced with for the functionality:
V$FUNCTION
INPUT.BUFFER
INPUT
REBUILD.SCREEN
Last edit: 4 months 2 weeks ago by Ramesh.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- VK
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Globus:G9-G13|TAFC:R05-R23|TAFJ:R19,R23,R24:test
Less
More
- Posts: 1174
- Thank you received: 156
4 months 2 weeks ago #24497
by VK
Cheers
VK
Replied by VK on topic INPUT.BUFFER, V$FUNCTION,REBUILD.SCREEN compatible IN R23
Hi
> V$FUNCTION
OK
> INPUT.BUFFER
Haven't tried recently but should be OK
> INPUT
If you're talking about jBC statement, it's OK with a single note:
"INPUT .. FOR counts time in seconds under TAFJ and not in 10th of seconds as TAFC does."
> REBUILD.SCREEN
I think OK but note that you can also use REFRESH.FIELD.
> V$FUNCTION
OK
> INPUT.BUFFER
Haven't tried recently but should be OK
> INPUT
If you're talking about jBC statement, it's OK with a single note:
"INPUT .. FOR counts time in seconds under TAFJ and not in 10th of seconds as TAFC does."
> REBUILD.SCREEN
I think OK but note that you can also use REFRESH.FIELD.
Cheers
VK
The following user(s) said Thank You: Ramesh
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ramesh
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
4 months 1 week ago - 4 months 1 week ago #24502
by Ramesh
Replied by Ramesh on topic INPUT.BUFFER, V$FUNCTION,REBUILD.SCREEN compatible IN R23
Thanks for the response, appreciate your INPUT. Also need to know regarding the following keywords as well:
1.WRITEBLK
2.Also do we use READU or F.READU when trying to read UNIX level directories.
is the following condition for READ also applies for READU:
- Only jBASE tables should be converted to core T24 routine F.READ.
- UNIX level directories using READ should not be replaced with F.READ.
3.TXTINP
1.WRITEBLK
2.Also do we use READU or F.READU when trying to read UNIX level directories.
is the following condition for READ also applies for READU:
- Only jBASE tables should be converted to core T24 routine F.READ.
- UNIX level directories using READ should not be replaced with F.READ.
3.TXTINP
Last edit: 4 months 1 week ago by Ramesh.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- VK
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Globus:G9-G13|TAFC:R05-R23|TAFJ:R19,R23,R24:test
Less
More
- Posts: 1174
- Thank you received: 156
4 months 1 week ago - 4 months 1 week ago #24504
by VK
Cheers
VK
Replied by VK on topic INPUT.BUFFER, V$FUNCTION,REBUILD.SCREEN compatible IN R23
Are you migrating from TAFC to TAFJ as well? Or you were under TAFJ already?
> 1.WRITEBLK
Didn't use... Under TAFC shall be OK.
> 2.Also do we use READU or F.READU when trying to read UNIX level directories.
Why using a lock on reading a directory? Just READ... or READSEQ.
> is the following condition for READ also applies for READU:
> - Only jBASE tables should be converted to core T24 routine F.READ.
> - UNIX level directories using READ should not be replaced with F.READ.
F.READ is just the same as READ with caching added.
3.TXTINP
Haven't used... But I believe shall be OK.
> 1.WRITEBLK
Didn't use... Under TAFC shall be OK.
> 2.Also do we use READU or F.READU when trying to read UNIX level directories.
Why using a lock on reading a directory? Just READ... or READSEQ.
> is the following condition for READ also applies for READU:
> - Only jBASE tables should be converted to core T24 routine F.READ.
> - UNIX level directories using READ should not be replaced with F.READ.
F.READ is just the same as READ with caching added.
3.TXTINP
Haven't used... But I believe shall be OK.
Cheers
VK
Last edit: 4 months 1 week ago by VK.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Ramesh
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Forum
- T24 Technical Discussions
- T24 Development & Customization
- INPUT.BUFFER, V$FUNCTION,REBUILD.SCREEN compatible IN R23
Time to create page: 0.084 seconds